Leadership oversight, organizational structure, roles, responsibilities, and accountability framework
"Our engineering team deployed facial recognition for employee access. Marketing used it for customer tracking. Legal had no idea. Regulators fined us for no governance oversight. No one knew who approved what."
Issue: No AI governance committee, unclear approval authority
"Auditors asked who's accountable for AI risk. We had 5 different people claim responsibility but no one actually owned it. Failed ISO 42001 audit on governance requirements."
Issue: Unclear accountability, no documented RACI
Complete AI governance infrastructure
Current state analysis, stakeholder interviews, gap identification
Governance structure design, RACI creation, charter development
Committee kickoff, documentation finalized, training completed
AI-specific governance vs generic IT governance
| Capability | Generic IT Governance | TrustRail (GSA Playbook) |
|---|---|---|
| Governance Focus |
❌ IT steering committee No AI-specific oversight |
✓ AI governance committee Dedicated to AI ethics, risk, compliance |
| Accountability Structure |
❌ CTO/CIO owns technology Doesn't cover AI fairness, bias, explainability |
✓ RACI covers all AI domains Technical, ethical, legal, operational |
| Documentation |
❌ Generic org charts Not structured for ISO 42001 audits |
✓ ISO 42001 Section 5 compliant Audit-ready governance documentation |
| Decision Authority |
❌ Unclear for AI use cases Who approves high-risk AI deployment? |
✓ Clear approval workflows Risk-based approval matrix documented |
| Executive Visibility |
❌ AI risks buried in IT reports Board doesn't see AI-specific issues |
✓ Board-level AI reporting Executive dashboard, quarterly reviews |
| Setup Time |
❌ 6-12 months to design Build governance framework from scratch |
✓ 4-6 weeks with expert facilitation Pre-built governance templates |
Built for ISO 42001 Section 5, not generic IT governance
Covers technical, ethical, legal, and operational domains
Expert facilitation, stakeholder workshops, documentation
GSA Playbook guides comprehensive governance structure design
Our GSA Playbook establishes AI governance structure:
Interview stakeholders, identify existing governance gaps
Define AI governance committee, charter, meeting cadence
Map roles, responsibilities, decision authority across AI lifecycle
Create governance policies, approval workflows, escalation paths
Committee kickoff, stakeholder training, documentation handoff
Our GSA Playbook produces audit-ready governance documentation:
Purpose, scope, membership, meeting cadence, decision authority
Comprehensive responsibility assignment across AI lifecycle
Approval workflows, risk acceptance authority, escalation paths
AI accountability mapped to org structure
💡 All documentation structured per ISO 42001 Section 5 requirements
Governance Structure Assessment methodology
Sample Outputs: Committee charter, RACI matrix, governance policy, org charts, approval workflows, board reporting templates
Choose the option that fits your needs
Get ISO 42001 Section 5 compliant in 4-6 weeks
sales@trustrail.ai